When debiasing backfires: accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Two studies demonstrated that attempts to debias hindsight by thinking about alternative outcomes may backfire and traced this to the influence of subjective accessibility experiences. Participants listed either few (2) or many (10) thoughts about how an event might have turned out otherwise. Listing many counterfactual thoughts was experienced as difficult and consistently increased the hindsight bias, presumably because the experienced difficulty suggested that there were not many ways in which the event might have turned out otherwise. No significant hindsight effects were obtained when participants listed only a few counterfactual thoughts, a task subjectively experienced as easy. The interplay of accessible content and subjective accessibility experiences in the hindsight bias is discussed.
منابع مشابه
Integrating temporal biases: the interplay of focal thoughts and accessibility experiences.
We provide an integrative account of temporal biases (confidence changes, planning fallacy, impact bias, and hindsight bias). Students listed either 3 or 12 thoughts about success or failure before an upcoming real-life exam or immediately after learning their grades. Previous explanations had focused on how thought content alone (what comes to mind) influences temporal biases. We found, howeve...
متن کاملActivating a mental simulation mind-set through generation of alternatives: Implications for debiasing in related and unrelated domains
Encouraging people to consider multiple alternatives appears to be a useful debiasing technique for reducing many biases (explanation, hindsight, and overconfidence), if the generation of alternatives is experienced as easy. The present research tests whether these alternative generation procedures induce a mental simulation mind-set (cf. Galinsky & Moskowitz, 2000), such that debiasing in one ...
متن کاملReducing the Hindsight Bias in Mock-Juror Decision Making: Assessing the Effectiveness of a Court-Appointed Witness
Because the legal system asks jurors to render a verdict with knowledge of the original outcome of events, jurors become susceptible to the human judgment phenomenon known as hindsight bias. This exploratory study extends previous research into hindsight debiasing in the courtroom context by utilizing a courtappointed expert witness to: 1) explain the bias to jurors, and 2) suggest strategies t...
متن کاملFraming effect debiasing in medical decision making.
OBJECTIVE Numerous studies have demonstrated the robustness of the framing effect in a variety of contexts. The present study investigated the effects of a debiasing procedure designed to prevent the framing effect for young adults who made decisions based on hypothetical medical decision-making vignettes. METHODS The debiasing technique involved participants listing advantages and disadvanta...
متن کاملIT Support for Reducing Group Judgment Biases
Systematic biases have been found in both individual and group judgments, calling for research into debiasing approaches. Although individual debiasing has been studied to some extent, no parallel effort exists for group debiasing. This paper advocates the use of group support systems (G&S) for group debiasing and presents a theoretical perspective on how the impact may be achieved. Special att...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
دوره 28 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002